When the Ozone is completely Depleted we will all be fried to the concrete! However scientists are coming up with a way to battle this.
1. Do you think mars would make a good home?
2. Isnt it kind of a scary idea to think that when you go to heaven, your there FOREVER!! how long is forever? will we never eternalkly rest?
3. Do you think we will live to see 40?
chill, wat u r saying is scarin me... ??? who told u that ani way?
he got that fromour science teacher but don't mind him he doesn't even know what he is saying. ;D
I do know what im saying jelly doughnut meatball, beached whale, crispy cream sphere!!
you men.... ;) ;) ;)
well, at least one of is... The other one is more like a little girl. COUGHemeraldzeldaCOUGH
haha!god u r funny!
The Ozone Layer is actually healing its holes. The whole global warming picture is not as dire as everyone is making it out to be--only 2 degrees celcius increase over like a hundred years, or some miniscule number like that.
yea we all be dead long before the ozones gone anyway.
god, cause i want tp! (lol)
we dont evn realy have 2 wory bout ozone yet , however
global warming is affecting natural disasters (new orleans , pakistan earthquake , tsunami)
we goin 2 have the next ice age within the next 10,000 years, but then again humans would have probs killed themselves out by then
eww. well i wont live that long, but i worry about my great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grand childeren. :-\
how do u know ull have that many? someone may stop the madness by not marrying.
and besides, u bothered to count that out? or are u just saying a random number? ???
there is 41 greats , looks random to me
Err... any home Is a good home when you got Zelda This site and OBLIVION to play... all i need... yeah and food...
lol we are not gonna die....yet.......
may be offencive 2 sum ppl
i can see the iran problem as going to be the first nucular war , or a big war at least. (u no , the iran want 2 have nucular power but aculaty want nucular wepons)
or china - im quite weary of china cos they econinmy is growing all the time - as is there population. when they become the worlds biggest econemy in 2020 (probs b4)
and there pop. will bet 1.5 Bil, they could basicly controll the worlds manurfactueing and wealth. and , being comnuist , mite declare WAR!
also , i wish Muslim (extreamists) would stop blowing everyone up and insted get married , get a job and have a few kids. they keep bitching 'bout everything 2 do with religion and i wich they would just shut up!
when my mum fired our Muslim maid cos she was stealing from us (what a cow) her parting words were
' Islam is Coming. We shall Inheret the Earth'
sorry if any of u find this offencive , it is just what i think .
and by the way i no im generalising , but just count it as im tlking bout the evil ppl , and not the nice ones.
i meant we die of old age... :D
i no , i wasnt tlking 2 u in perticular , it was more of a 'grinds my gears' moment , but World politics too
::)
yea its not safe any where you go
i feel safe in america (besides the fact everyone hate US )
why would people hate america?
god bless america!
:'( alright Medli True
srry i cant say the same bout England ;D jk
>:(
;)
Lol haha 8)
Quote from: Omni-Link on March 03, 2006, 08:29:06 AM
yea its not safe any where you go
i feel safe in america (besides the fact everyone hate US )
got say thats kinda tru. pretty much the rest of the world (including the majority of the british public , even tho the PM bums the USA) resent america. or at least the ppl ive tlked 2 do.
normaly steriotypoed as 'fat dum trugger-happy sh*ts'
in europe. sorry guys- i no its not tru!!!!
w/e........
i stand for wat i said
Trigger happy is true HAHAHAHA
thats funny bought we are well armed
bet you are............
you go omni link!!!!!!!! :D
????? did u even understand what he said properly?
not really no,but it's polite to reply
lol.....okay
:-\
i'm a lady and ladies are polite! ;)
polite - ameriacan hah hah aha ha ( fells of chair)
thats rich
whats that supposed to meen?
i know im not polite or *Proper* especialy not proper
yeh well medli is british , so u no :)
p.s. not all british girl are posilte , actualy medli is the first one ive ever met ;)
yea,i'm pretty polite! ;)
but when i'm angry and seeing as i'm a red head,you better stay outta my way! ;D
Whoa, just take it easy, medli! lol ;)
.....red head sounds Hot ........temperd
just calm down check ur pressure points and Repeat " OOsa OOsaa ooossaaa"
" for anger management"
(hair the hair is hot)
Quote from: Omni-Link on March 03, 2006, 05:51:42 PM
polite - ameriacan hah hah aha ha ( fells of chair)
thats rich
Hey now, you take that back or we'll invade and take all your stuff! :P
i am Ameriacan i said that because were not NOTED for our politness
but i was just kidding
yeah lets keep it that way. our president is a monkey, but that doesent nessicerily meen thet we are not polite.
Why aren't we talking about the ozone layer!? This is a world crisis that we have to solve, or Link would probably be dried out faster than you can say "Tingle, Tingle, Kooloo-Limpah!"
Transmuting Mars would take quite a while until it'd be suitable for life. We'd better bring cyanobacteria to the surface if we want to survive!
were gonna die......
When another World WAR comes and it is so bad taht they have to start Drafting people again....
And you die because u kill to live
( yea well all die as Honorable Soldier's nothing better)
Quote from: Omni-Link on March 08, 2006, 05:54:55 PM
were gonna die......
When another World WAR comes and it is so bad taht they have to start Drafting people again....
And you die because u kill to live
( yea well all die as Honorable Soldier's nothing better)
Dude, nothing that bad is going to happen. There won't be another World War because it would be bad for the global economy. Even China is behaving because they are more interested in American greenbacks than blood.
And you certianly won't ever see a draft unless it is a really dire event, like WW2. Any politican who voted for a draft would never get re-elected again. It's political suicide. Heck, even the Army said they don't want a draft because it produces crappier soldiers than a volunteer force.
I suppose you're right, Jack. The chances of us having to draft in this period are slim to none.
Not only that! But also I read an article that said that the American Army, at its current size and if at full strength and unengaged anywhere, could take on the top five armies of the world combined and still smash them to bits.
That's why I don't worry about a draft, because we don't need one.
Hell, we don't even need wars anymore, but this crazy head rogue states keep insisting on acquiring nuclear weapons and threatening to wipe other countries off the map.
We could have that much vaunted world peace right now if people just stopped acting like bloody bleepheads.
for startes - what the hell is a draft?
Quote from: Jack on March 09, 2006, 08:40:51 AM
Not only that! But also I read an article that said that the American Army, at its current size and if at full strength and unengaged anywhere, could take on the top five armies of the world combined and still smash them to bits
i bet you anything an american made that article.
you guys lost like 2,000,troops aginst a rabble of iraqies with AKs- how do you think you would fare against 200,000 troops fully armed and fully trained with a legion of Challenger II tanks at their side?
BIGGEST ARMIES
MANPOWER__TOTAL(mln)__LAND(mln)_NAVY(thou)_AIRFORCE(thou)
CHINA___________2.30_________1.60_____________400_____________255
USA____________1.45__________0.51_____________379_____________376
INDIA___________1.33__________1.10_____________170_____________61
RUSSIA_________1.20__________0.26_____________190_____________188
N.KOREA________1.11__________0.95______________110_____________47
WHO HAVE MORE WEAPONS?
TANK/APC(thousands)___PLANES/chopers___SHIPS/SUBMARINES
USA_______________26/44_________________2800/3500_________92/281
RUSSIA______________22/36_________________2500/3000________42/310
CHINA_______________19/30_________________1750/1250________85/315
INDIA________________13/21_________________1080/1115________27/200
N.KOREA______________9/16___________________553/410_________19/93
In addition America have 12 carriers, Russia have one and India have one in construction.
AMOUNT OF NUKES
USA ----------6600
RUSSIA ----- 6300
FRANCE -----500
CHINA -------450
ENGLAND ---380
INDIA --------70
PAKISTAN -- 30
BELEIVED AMOUNT OF NUKES
Israel --------80-100
Iran ----------25-30
N.Korea -----15-20
you guys would get pwned by russia and china , let alone the rest. the US polititions like you guys to think you safe......
So what if the "US can take on five countries" thing isn't true? Like Jack said, it wouldn't happen. The point is the US army is pretty darn good, so us Americans who aren't in the military don't have to worry about the draft. By the way, a draft is when the military calls on civilians to join in drastic situations.
1. 2 million Americans have not died in Iraq. That number came from... where? It's like 2100+ have died, no more than 2500. And you're giving Iraqi insurgent combat activites far more credence than they deserve. There is a far bigger difference between an engagement done on equal terms (which is what my five armies statement referred to) and a guerilla war which the smaller force will ALWAYS excel at.
2. Your charts have no conceptualization of quality on them. American troops are the most thoroughly trained on the planet. Mreover, our equipment and supply systems are the most advanced in the world.
3. N Korea's army is an absolute joke. Despite being 1 million strong they are chronically starved and under-supplied, and are dependent on Chinese arms donations just to keep their own people in line.
4. Russia's army is slowly, much like the country itself, dying. The government doesn't have the money to keep the armed forces operational--hence discussions on cutitng back the size of the Baltic fleet and the 2 recent sub disasters.
5. I don't know what is implied with "the US polititions like you guys to think you safe......" However, unlike some countries, we don't need our politicians to do the thinking for us.
6. Consider:
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/ca/WorldMilitarySpending.jpg/350px-WorldMilitarySpending.jpg)
Quote from: Jack on March 09, 2006, 05:33:20 PM
2. Your charts have no conceptualization of quality on them. American troops are the most thoroughly trained on the planet. Mreover, our equipment and supply systems are the most advanced in the world.
Uk are superior!
and nothing beats a good old AK-47
(when it comes to infantry weapons, of course)
Quote from: Evilbob on March 10, 2006, 08:37:14 AM
Uk are superior!
I agree, I love the UK. And not just because they're one of the only European countries willing to help defend civilization.
by the way i ment 'like 2000 troops' not 2 million-
serius typo
we (the u.k) have lost 102 troops in the war. 13 died due to u.s freinly fire.lol
anyways- ur guys arnt too advanced - i mean , ur most current tank doesnt even have rifled barrels! (u no , curved grooves in the barrel for a faster and a lot more acurate shot
I don't know enough about American Tanks to argue the point, but I'm pretty sure that if we're not at the top, we must be pretty high up there. At the start of the war, our tank columns shot right through the Iraqi desert to Baghdad in days and managed to mantian the stringiest of supplylines the whole time.
von Schlieffen would have crapped himself if he ever saw how effective our opening tank run was.
von Schlieffen would have crapped himself anyway - he had cronic diareeah. lol - its tru
Quote from: dan_the_man on March 10, 2006, 01:14:32 PM
von Schlieffen would have crapped himself anyway - he had cronic diareeah. lol - its tru
lol, creepy Bismarckian Germans.
i found the yank freindly fire in the war quite anyoying- how hard could it be to disguingwish? lol- duno how 2 spell it.
I've never been in combat, but I think it's a fairly good guess to say that things can get awfully confusing during a live-fire situation.
And not only Americans have been shooting their allies. There's no way that's possible.
And consider this: There are/were more Americans in Iraq any other country. If you think in the simple terms of probability, more people = more people to make a mistake.
Both America and the UK suffer from having embarisingly bad leaders. Bush's "bushisms" are world renound ( E.G. "we have mis-underestamated the enemy's potential for creating new ways to fight us. They will not stop trying to kill us, and neither will we.) and as for Tony Blair.... As a British member of the public I can say his leadership is hardly encouraging. Because of his new "fast track" NHS Surgeons are brought into the country with little training in surgery or even the English language and are told to opperate. The Government claims a 99% success rate with all these poor people who are told to do surgery they have had little training with. However these stastics are flawed, because the Government counts people who are crippled and forced to use a wheel chair because of these opperations as succeses! Only those who died are classed as failures. Plus his new ideas for school systems are not increadable. Basicly we will have less lessons and more exams. This is not very helpful for people who have exam pressure problems. Exams have been proven before to only show a small insight into the intelligence of 50% of the UK's children.
Ahhhhh.... I feel better after that rant....
yeh well , atleast we HAVE an NHS. ppl take it for granted , if u ever brake your arm or cut ur hand open , the NHS will help you professionally and for free!
as for tony bliar.....i wish ppl would get off his back. hes alrite- sure he comes under pressure from political enemys a lot , but a lot of what is in the tabloids is BS.
anyways- our school system isnt that bad- but if the PM gets rid of selective schooling (e.g. grammars schools- like im in) and they are all academys or comprihensive- THEN it will just be downhill from there
errrrrrrrr,i'm getting lost here.......
:P
Join the club. :)
k................gotta toilet in there? jk lol ;)
Maybe...outhouse or indoor plumbing?
indooor with big door and lock plz! ;D
Hahahaha! You got it!
and don't forget air freshener! ;Dlol
awww....you guys have ruined a perfectly good adult topic. i like tlking polotics and war, but now we have 2 tlk bout toilets ??? >:( ???
Hey, hey, don't you be dissin' our toilets!
The only people who don't like toilets have never used any...or cleaned any, for that matter. ;D
Can i join your club
she was saying the she was confused also , not that they ACTUALLY have a club.
yes we do! u can join howl! ;D
Yeah, Howl! We're going to have an indoor pool at the clubhouse! ;)
ANYWAYS... so, we were talking about everyone going to die? 8)
So, all this disatisfaction with Blair (and that "Bliar" was a typo, right, Dan? Haha) and his government... yet the Tories still have a snowball's chance of getting power in the UK? How does that work?
i dont like the lib dems, nor do i espech like labour or tories.
in fact , i think i mite make my own party- the
Zelda , Family Guy and Other Cool Stuff Party.
we stand for more money going to shows like family guy and Zelda being our Offical national Game, instaed of cricket. i would type more but i got homework to do :(
and jack- of course it was an accidental typo ;)
Tony Blair rocks. What political party is he?
lol , labour. - although (New) Labours policys are more like the concervitives nowerdays.
but i wouldnt expect any forien ppl 2 understand british polotic , just like i dont realy no the U.S system - i no im only 14 but still
Quote from: dan_the_man on March 13, 2006, 02:41:20 PM
but i wouldnt expect any forien ppl 2 understand british polotic , just like i dont realy no the U.S system - i no im only 14 but still
I like to think I have a pretty good grasp of the British political system. :-\
cool - im taking World Polotics for GCESs , as well as 11 other GCSEs (a very high amount)
i duno what the US equilivant is tho.
There is very little choice between british political party's now mainly because most are very similar. Where as previously ther were partys that each had set views and if you believed in one view then you had a party to join. It has now got a lot more complicated as party's change their morals and what they stand for depending on what they think the majority of people believe.
Quote from: Davros on March 17, 2006, 11:47:37 PM
There is very little choice between british political party's now mainly because most are very similar. Where as previously ther were partys that each had set views and if you believed in one view then you had a party to join. It has now got a lot more complicated as party's change their morals and what they stand for depending on what they think the majority of people believe.
they don't change anything exept their lies