The Desert Colossus

Community => General Discussion => Topic started by: Takun on December 28, 2007, 09:04:55 AM

Title: Photobucket?
Post by: Takun on December 28, 2007, 09:04:55 AM
Ummm, I dont know if Im doing this right or not but when I go to photobucket and search for lets say a stick figure movie, it always shows me pics of people. Things that have nothing to do with stick figure movies. WHHAT AM I DOING WROOOOOOONG?!
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: Fishalicious on December 28, 2007, 09:15:54 AM
It's like typing in anything in Google, good sir.

Type in pie. What do you get? Porn. Type in baby. What do you get? Porn, and shriveled up, diseased feti. Type in piglet. Instead of getting a cute little Winnie the Pooh character, you get pigs being skinned alive for meat... and porn.
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: darkphantomime on December 28, 2007, 10:10:32 AM
I saw no porn on babies or piglets. I count that as a good thing, because then maybe society isn't so screwed up after all. I also got the cute piglet on pages 1-3, almost uniformly.
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: Fishalicious on December 28, 2007, 11:03:34 AM
...beginner's luck.

Ah, not really, but you do get porn for just about everything, you know? Rule 34 and all that jazz.
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: darkphantomime on December 28, 2007, 11:14:06 AM
I even went to page ten on babies. Still no porn.

Though that's more than I can say for pie.
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: Fishalicious on December 28, 2007, 11:16:56 AM
Yeah, pie is a horrible word. Same with goat. ...and mannequins, oh dear god.

This is assumed that you have safesearch off completely, though. Only a fool does that. ... Or someone looking for porn.
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: darkphantomime on December 28, 2007, 11:21:54 AM
At least the mannequins aren't anatomically correct.

......

I'll shut up now.
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: Fishalicious on December 28, 2007, 11:25:05 AM
True, true. Though, uh... certain 'kinds' can be. >_> of course, those aren't usually used for displaying clothes, either.

Mm, though, the best thing I remember about babies is the Rugrats. I've seen some horrible fan-made ideas of that show... u___u;;;
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: Hi no Seijin on December 28, 2007, 12:48:56 PM
Let's just blow up Photobucket altogether and find a better image hosting site.  That's not Imageshack.
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: darkphantomime on December 28, 2007, 12:53:01 PM
ANd what's wrong with imageshack?
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: Hi no Seijin on December 28, 2007, 12:54:24 PM
I tried using it before.  I couldn't figure it out.  And everytime that I recall following a link to an image uploaded in Imageshack, it wouldn't show the pic.
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: Commodore Axilon on December 28, 2007, 12:56:08 PM
Uh, it sucks?

In my travels I've learned that there is no good image hosing site, they all have some horrible flaw or another. I just use Photobucket 'cause I'm lazy. ;)
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: Takun on December 28, 2007, 12:57:51 PM
So, uhhh, besides the many facts about porn. Does anyone have any suggesstions on my problem?
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: darkphantomime on December 28, 2007, 01:52:56 PM
Use quotation marks when you enter a search term? Like "stick pencil movies"?
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: Rev Rabies on December 28, 2007, 02:11:33 PM
Quote from: JQ Pickwick on December 28, 2007, 11:14:06 AM
I even went to page ten on babies. Still no porn.

Though that's more than I can say for pie.

there was some on the first page for pie
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: Vaati on December 28, 2007, 03:03:57 PM
Quote from: Heriophant on December 28, 2007, 09:04:55 AM
Ummm, I dont know if Im doing this right or not but when I go to photobucket and search for lets say a stick figure movie, it always shows me pics of people. Things that have nothing to do with stick figure movies. WHHAT AM I DOING WROOOOOOONG?!

Nothing, Photobucket is just screwed up. It does it with me, too. So I don't bother. I know it's probably supposed to work, but I guess photos are their specialty, and therefore, suck at everything but photos.  :-*
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: Takun on December 28, 2007, 03:11:33 PM
Thank you all mighty lord vaati.
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: Vaati on December 28, 2007, 03:18:30 PM
Do itashi mashite!  :)
(You're welcome)
There may be a sight out there that speacialized in video stuff. I'd Google it.
Title: Re:Photobucket?
Post by: Takun on December 28, 2007, 03:38:23 PM
Ok, thank you.