This is from a random complaint generater I found on another forum. Just plug in a name of a person or organization and it writes a huge complaint letter in seconds. http://www.pakin.org/complaint/
Based on The Desert Colossus's response to my previous letter, I believe it's safe to say that this cannot go on much longer. To get right down to it, there is a problem here. A very large, caustic, peremptory problem. I have a problem with The Desert Colossus's use of the phrase, "We all know that...". With this phrase, it doesn't need to prove its claim that it can achieve its goals by friendly and moral conduct; it merely accepts it as fact. To put it another way, it parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, its ideas will change instantly, like a weathercock.
Is The Desert Colossus a pious organization? Yes, although its "piety" unerringly leads it to whichever dogma is best for business. Speaking of which, The Desert Colossus argues that it is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha. To maintain this thesis, The Desert Colossus naturally has had to shovel away a mountain of evidence, which it does by the desperate expedient of claiming that it can override nature.
Because of The Desert Colossus's eagerness to participate in riots, it may institutionalize sex discrimination by requiring different standards of protection and behavior for men and women right after it reads this letter. Let it. In the coming days, I will fight for our freedom of speech. The Desert Colossus has, at times, called me "iconoclastic" or "disloyal". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to muzzle The Desert Colossus's critics.
The Desert Colossus fervently believes that hanging out with disgusting misers is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. This shows that it is not merely mistaken about one little fact among millions of facts but that The Desert Colossus says that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights. You know, it can lie as much as it wants but it can't change the facts. If it could, it'd truly prevent anyone from hearing that it is utterly gung-ho about jujuism because it lacks more pressing soapbox issues. The Desert Colossus should feel ashamed of itself, and deep down in our bones, we all know why. Without a doubt, however, several things The Desert Colossus has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of its that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how it has the trappings of deity. The Desert Colossus wants all of us to believe that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication. That's why it sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. I mention that in this spot because of its close connection with the item just above. Get that straight, please. Any other thinking is blame-shoving or responsibility-dodging. Furthermore, our national media is controlled by self-deceiving, gloomy jokers. That's why you probably haven't heard that I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with The Desert Colossus and its followers, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that there are some basic biological realities of the world in which we live. These realities are doubtless regrettable, but they are unalterable. If The Desert Colossus finds them intolerable and unthinkable, the only thing that I can suggest is that it try to flag down a flying saucer and take passage for some other solar system, possibly one in which the residents are oblivious to the fact that The Desert Colossus's values symbolize lawlessness, violence, and misguided rebellion -- extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of us lose more than a little freedom.
I never cease to be amazed at the way that griping about The Desert Colossus will not make it stop trying to perpetuate the nonsense known technically as the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. But even if it did, it would just find some other way to make us the helpless puppets of our demographic labels. Up to this point, we have explored some of the motivations and circumstances that make The Desert Colossus want to dominate the whole earth and take possession of all its riches. However, we must look beyond both The Desert Colossus's motivations and history if we are truly to understand its rejoinders.
Anyway, the consequence of all this is that the facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely accepted, notion that it is not only acceptable, but indeed desirable, to kill the messenger and control the message. Given what I know about larcenous, addlepated scroungers, I can say with confidence that the next time The Desert Colossus decides to make people weak and dependent, it should think to itself, cui bono? -- who benefits?
I am not mistaken when I say that if The Desert Colossus can't be reasoned out of its prejudices, it must be laughed out of them. If The Desert Colossus can't be argued out of its selfishness, it must be shamed out of it. The truth hurts, doesn't it, The Desert Colossus? While it is reasonable to expect that most acts of conformism are committed not by disaffected lounge lizards but by The Desert Colossus's legates in an attempt to change the course of history, it remains that it's really not bloody-mindedness that compels me to encourage opportunity, responsibility, and community. It's my sense of responsibility to you, the reader. We must put inexorable pressure on The Desert Colossus to be a bit more careful about what it says and does. Our children depend on that.
If I didn't think The Desert Colossus would encourage a deadly acceptance of intolerance, I wouldn't say that it yields to the mammalian desire to assert individuality by attracting attention. Unfortunately, for The Desert Colossus, "attract attention" usually implies "bad-mouth worthy causes". Ironically, I am intellectually honest enough to admit my own previous ignorance in that matter. I only wish that The Desert Colossus had the same intellectual honesty. To pick an obvious, but often overlooked, example, if, five years ago, I had described an organization like The Desert Colossus to you and told you that in five years, it'd deprive individuals of the right to fight the warped, distorted, misshapen, unwholesome monstrosity that its effusions have become, you'd have thought me putrid. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact. Of particular interest to me is the way that The Desert Colossus continuously denies that the time has come to provide you with a holistic and thematic history of its flighty biases. (Actually, it has rightly earned the scorn and derision with which it is viewed in many quarters but that's not important now.)
By refusing to act, by refusing to encourage individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish, we are giving The Desert Colossus the power to infantilize and corrupt the public. The Desert Colossus has no ground and no right to trick our children into adopting unconventional, disapproved-of opinions and ways of life. In reaching that conclusion, I have made the usual assumption that I know more about onanism than most people. You might even say that I'm an expert on the subject. I can therefore state with confidence that I'm not writing this letter for your entertainment. I'm not even writing it for your education. I'm writing it for our very survival. Only through education can individuals gain the independent tools they need to make The Desert Colossus pay for its crimes against humanity. But the first step is to acknowledge that if it had even a shred of intellectual integrity, it'd admit that it's unfortunate that it has no real morals. It's impossible to debate important topics with organizations that are so ethically handicapped. This is a free country, and I suspect we ought to keep it that way. If you don't think that The Desert Colossus does not have a record of tolerance, then you've missed the whole point of this letter. This should be a chance to examine and bring problems to light, to share and join in understanding, but we must overcome the fears that beset us every day of our lives. We must overcome the fear that The Desert Colossus will spit in the face of propriety. And to overcome these fears, we must perform noble deeds.
What does this mean for our future? For one thing, it means that from secret-handshake societies meeting at "the usual place" to back-door admissions committees, The Desert Colossus's collaborators have always found a way to inflict more death and destruction than Genghis Khan's hordes. So you see, I have had enough of The Desert Colossus's waste, fraud, misfeasance, and malfeasance.
???? That is very strange... and far too long!
Lies, all lies!
Everyone, repeat after me: TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.
We know you like to participate in riots, Jack. :D
All that would basically be libel if meant seriously, right?
TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.
;)
OMG! U shure did write alot shadowlink13!
No I didn't. ;) All I did was type TDC into this. http://www.pakin.org/complaint/
Quote from: Jack on April 05, 2006, 01:24:34 PM
Lies, all lies!
Everyone, repeat after me: TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.
TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE.TDC IS LIFE. TDC IS LIFE... Try repeating
that five times fast! ;)
we need a spell check on where we type our post
Quote from: shadowlink13 on April 05, 2006, 01:52:01 PM
All that would basically be libel if meant seriously, right?
Well, I'd have to prove it was injurious to my reputation and give evidence of actual damages I have incurred. And you'd have to actually mean it.
we need a spell check
Quote from: Howl on April 05, 2006, 05:19:28 PM
we need a spell check
Eh, just download Google Toolbar. It has a spellchecker built in that you can use on websites.
cool ;D
and i'm supposed to read all that?
that toke 15 min. of my life 2 read that, gee thanks
"Speaking of which, The Desert Colossus argues that it is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha."
;D
what s Budda?
a guy who started a relgion, how long did it take him 2 type it i don't know
i don't wanna know either
the only complint i have is stop wid da warnings!
Quote from: medli on April 07, 2006, 06:52:00 AM
the only complint i have is stop wid da warnings!
Stop breaking the rules and you won't be warned. :-\
i have a qoestion thats on topic: why can't we double post, does it have something to do with bandwidth
No, it's frustrating for other members of the board, and it's common courtesy. You can just as easily modify your last post and add more to it than double post.
oohhh. thank you
My complaint about the desert colossus is that it's so easy to peruse through and find exactly what it is you want, plus the fact that all the information is as accurate as the informers can get it.
........that's sarcasm, in case..nobody knew....um....yeah....I think I should shut up now.
is that good ???
Quote from: daemonsage420 on April 07, 2006, 12:06:11 PM
My complaint about the desert colossus is that it's so easy to peruse through and find exactly what it is you want, plus the fact that all the information is as accurate as the informers can get it.
Being sarcasm, does that mean you think my information is inaccurate and hard to find?
i'm surprised u ain't locked this seeing as it's a complaint bout ur site
The first post wasn't.
And besides, I'd rather know what people honestly think about the site so I can fix the problems.
How many times do I have to say this. This thread is not a serious complaint. I plugged the sites' name into the Random Complaint Generator, link provided in first post, and it came up with a huge letter that is not meant to be taking seriously. Read the red text in the first post.
oh ok then
makes sence
if u keep posting on and on, i think people wont wnat to sign up! right Jack?
right
stop spamming the board, leave it to the chatboard
who do u think u are?!
i'm jking
topic:
........erm,lost the topic 0_o
I really don't have much complaints about TDC. I suppose I like it as is. ;D
Here is a complaint it generated about myself, SL13.
QuoteThere are a number of things I could have chosen to write about in this letter. I could have chosen to write about how Shadowlink13's ideas have reached a depth of degeneracy that was virtually unknown in the past. Or I might have chosen to write something about the way that some of his jejune jokes are so self-contradictory, they're their own refutation. But, instead, I've decided to devote this entire letter to explaining how opposing Shadowlink13's rude ethics actively and earnestly is the moral duty of every good human being. Those readers of brittle disposition might do well to await a ride on the next emotionally indulgent transport; this one is scheduled nonstop over rocky roads. As soon as you're strapped in, I'll announce something to the effect of how if history follows its course, it should be evident that mass anxiety is the equivalent of steroids for Shadowlink13. If we feel helpless, Shadowlink13 is energized and ramps up his efforts to slow scientific progress. Each of these issues is central to the Lysenkoism debate. I'll probably devote a separate letter to that topic alone, but for now, I'll simply summarize by stating that if you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong. With this in mind, I must condemn Shadowlink13's hypocrisy.
Shadowlink13 exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up his obvious inferiority. I respect his prevarications, although I don't care what others say about him. Shadowlink13's still anti-democratic, vexatious, and he intends to deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols. While it is reasonable to expect that mere association tends to lend credence to Shadowlink13's comrades because people assume they can't be that bad if a respected person is associated with them, it remains that Shadowlink13 is absolutely gung-ho about elitism because he lacks more pressing soapbox issues.
Shadowlink13 has planted his legatees everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on. Not only does this subversive approach enhance Shadowlink13's ability to create a world sunk in the most abject superstition, fanaticism, and ignorance but it also provides irrefutable evidence that he claims that the average working-class person can't see through his chicanery. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in his arguments. Then again, if Shadowlink13 wants to complain, he should have an argument. He shouldn't just throw out the word "methylenedioxymethamphetamine", for example, and expect us to be scared. One does not have to undermine serious institutional and economic analyses and replace them with a diverting soap opera of perfidious conspiracies in order to reinforce the contentions of all reasonable people and confute those of the most myopic drunks you'll ever see. It is a bloodthirsty person who believes otherwise. If I had to choose the most vapid specimen from Shadowlink13's welter of devious gabble, it would have to be Shadowlink13's claim that Trotskyism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society. When Shadowlink13 looks in the mirror in the morning, does he see more than the same, hateful, loathsome face that all scabrous clodpolls share? I can give you only my best estimate, made after long and anxious consideration, but I do not pose as an expert in these matters. I can say only that he constantly insists that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. But he contradicts himself when he says that people are pawns to be used and manipulated.
Astute observers have known for years that many people are shocked when I tell them that the messages contained in Shadowlink13's actions are a powerful source of illumination on the behavior of the most virulent numskulls I've ever seen. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that my current plan is to scrap the entire constellation of shiftless ideas that brought us to our present point. Yes, he will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but what really irks me is that he has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let him play fast and loose with the truth or he'll deny minorities a cultural voice. Contemptible ragamuffins are burdened with the preconceived ideas or feeble understanding of the circles to which they previously belonged, both politically and philosophically. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me. If we contradict Shadowlink13, we are labelled annoying devotees of conspiracy theories. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms.
I'll give you an example of this, based on my own experience. As you know, Shadowlink13's publications have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together -- life! In the end, Shadowlink13 lacks the courage to confront me face-to-face.
"Methylenedioxymethamphetamine," that is a big word. I should look it up. By the looks of it, it is a stimulent drug of the amphetamine family (duh).
*Looks it up.* Oh, it's ecstasy. Nasty stuff.
No wonder people gave a shorter name for it. ;)
i love it! exept when i dont have any topics that have a reply and when i dont have any mail. thats why i love it when Medli replys tome alot!
I got banned from a couple forums for using this generator. I did something on the Cleveland Browns Message Board and got banned right away for complaining about their quarterback. Then I went crazy and started pounding Randy Moss on the Raiders board. I would provide a direct link, but can't since I can't go back until 2008.
Complaint about davros...
QuoteMy complaint about Lord Davros The Dalek IV
To all readers: This is not a tickle-your-ears, politically correct letter. If you want to read something that's filled with rhetoric, read something else. If you want the truth, then read this letter. What follows is a series of remarks addressed to the readers of this letter and to Lord Davros The Dalek IV himself. Let's all keep our fingers crossed that he doesn't put increased disruptive powers in the hands of the most satanic dossers you'll ever see. We cannot afford to waste our time, resources, and energy by dwelling upon inequities of the past. Instead, we must view the realms of obstructionism and nonrepresentationalism not as two opposing poles, but as two continua. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people were to understand that Davros's press releases are the fertilizer that grows mercantalism to monstrous proportions. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of Davros's oleaginous deeds and morbid beliefs. I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that Davros's tirades do not pass muster by any objective standards. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that Davros likes to posture as a guardian of virtue and manners. However, when it comes right down to it, what he is pushing is both impractical and intrusive.
Davros asserts that he's the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. Most reasonable people, however, recognize such assertions as nothing more than baseless, if wishful, claims unsupported by concrete evidence. Regardless of what he seems to insist, Davros is the most stentorian, foolhardy, and inane waste of genetic material in our society. He might further political and social goals wholly or in part through activities that involve force or violence and a violation of criminal law in the coming days. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome?
If I had to choose between chopping onions and helping Davros attack everyone else's beliefs, I'd be in the kitchen in an instant. Although both alternatives make me cry, the deciding factor for me is that lascivious crybabies serve as the priests in Davros's cult of uncivilized phallocentrism. These "priests" spend their days basking in Davros's reflected glory, pausing only when Davros instructs them to call evil good and good evil. What could be more crotchety? Here's the answer, albeit in a somewhat circuitous and roundabout style: He says he's going to alter, rewrite, or ignore past events to make them consistent with his current "reality" sooner or later. Is he out of his mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that his vituperations can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that we must remove our chains and move towards the light. (In case you didn't understand that analogy, the chains symbolize Davros's fatuitous viewpoints, and the light represents the goal of getting all of us to pave the way for people of every sex, race, and socioeconomic status to fulfill their own spiritual destiny.) You know, it strikes me that most people don't realize that Davros has already revealed his plans to topple society. He revealed these plans in a manifesto bearing all of the hallmarks of having been written by a lewd, atrabilious tosser. Not only is his manifesto entirely lacking in logic, relentlessly subjective, and utterly anecdotal, but it has been a long-standing observation of mine that Davros should just face the facts -- and Davros knows it. His personal interest in seeing his declamations shoved down people's throats is demonic, but that's to be expected of Davros. If he is going to talk about higher standards, then he needs to live by those higher standards.
More to the point, Davros is like a giant octopus sprawling its slimy length over city, state, and nation. Like the octopus of real life, he operates under cover of self-created screen. Davros seizes in his long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection. However obtuse the national picture already is, he has been known to say that violence and prejudice are funny. That notion is so detestable, I hardly know where to begin refuting it. Many people aren't aware of how unpleasant Davros's suggestions are, so let's present a little breakdown. First off, Davros's methods are much subtler now than ever before. Davros is more adept at hidden mind control and his techniques of social brainwash are much more appealingly streamlined and homogenized. Now, perhaps you think I'm imagining things. Perhaps you think that he really isn't going to advocate measures that others criticize for being excessively acrimonious. Well, I wish it were just my imagination. But you know, he should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory.
I don't get it: Where are the people who are willing to stand up and acknowledge that unless Davros provides unequivocal evidence to the contrary, I will continue to think that the odds are more than ten to one that he has mastered the dark arts of diversion and deception? I mean, he just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to convert houses of worship into houses of gangsterism." Is it important that I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke him to dismantle the family unit? Of course it's important. But what's more important is that Davros is out to reduce social and cultural awareness to a dictated set of guidelines to follow. And when we play his game, we become accomplices. A colleague recently informed me that a bunch of vitriolic criminal masterminds and others in Davros's amen corner are about to distort and trivialize the debate surrounding obscurantism. I have no reason to doubt that story because the justification Davros gave for seeking to place callous psychopaths at the top of the social hierarchy was one of the most mutinous justifications I've ever heard. It was so mutinous, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to ensure that we survive and emerge triumphant out of the coming chaos and destruction. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why Davros coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his words sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. I would like to close by saying that Lord Davros The Dalek IV minces to the twang of a different zither.
Read it all. it's quite accurate. sometimes.
Quote from: shadowlink13 on April 19, 2006, 06:12:11 PM
I got banned from a couple forums for using this generator.
WOW
you cant take a hint Can You?
Some people need more than a nudge... sometimes a shove or a punch. that usually gets the blood pumpin.
Yea your right
I think that this should be locked but Jack says he wants to hear what people have to say about TDC
I say it took a long time coming but it is great now and it is actualy getting better.
i have nothing but Good things to say about TDC ;D
Quote from: shadowlink13 on April 07, 2006, 12:53:53 PM
How many times do I have to say this. This thread is not a serious complaint. I plugged the sites' name into the Random Complaint Generator, link provided in first post, and it came up with a huge letter that is not meant to be taking seriously. Read the red text in the first post.
I got one word: READ!
I fully agree with you there Shadowlink13. People should look before they leap....uhh, I mean speak.
QuoteI've been debating with myself over the last few weeks whether or not I should write this letter. Obviously, I outvoted myself and wrote it. I concluded I absolutely had to tell you that Princess Zelda Nohansen is so incredibly illiterate that she really ought to change her name to "Illiterate McIlliterate, the Illiterate Queen of the Illiterate". First, the misinformation: Zelda suggests that the few of us who complain regularly about her blanket statements are simply spoiling the party. Where the heck did she come up with that? Well, I'm sure Zelda would rather bring ugliness and nastiness into our lives than answer that particular question.
Even when the facts don't fit, Zelda sometimes tries to use them anyway. She still maintains, for instance, that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash. She has been known to "prove" statistically that she is a perpetual victim of injustice. As you might have suspected, her proof is flawed. The primary problem with it is that it replaces a legitimate claim of association with an illegitimate claim of causality. Consequently, Zelda's "proof" demonstrates only that there are some simple truths in this world. First, when a socially inept, gutless fink has been beaten down with the successive hammer blows of parasitism, gnosticism, and frotteurism, she becomes quite receptive to Zelda's propaganda and quite likely to join her army of purblind gauleiters. Second, what we see today is a greater than normal manifestation of malignant traits in Zelda's drug-induced ravings. And finally, Zelda maliciously defames and damagingly misrepresents everyone and everything around her. There's a word for that: libel. I respect the English language and believe in the use of words as a means of communication. Obstreperous Luddites like Zelda, however, consider spoken communication as merely a set of noises uttered to excite emotions in beer-guzzling, combative smart alecks in order to convince them to change the course of history. Ask her about any of her comrades who replace Robert's Rules of Order with "facilitated consensus building" at all important meetings, and the refractory hellion will say, "I never meant they should go that far." Yeah, right. The truth is that Zelda's proposed social programs are misleading and deceptive. Regular readers of my letters probably take that for granted, but if I am to fight scurrility and slander, I must explain to the population at large that Zelda intends to create a new social class. Overbearing clunks, reprehensible devotees of conspiracy theories, and barbaric dummkopfs will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their pals.
If we are powerless to resolve our disputes without violence, it is because we have allowed Zelda to gum up what were once great ideas. What I think -- and I'm no specialist -- is that now that I've been exposed to her treatises, I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps her fans all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way Zelda keeps them loyal to her is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. Now, perhaps you think I'm imagining things. Perhaps you think that she really isn't going to make us too confused, demoralized, and disunited to put up an effective opposition to her theories. Well, I wish it were just my imagination. But you know, in these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, the limitation and final abolition of alarmism presuppose the elimination of innumerable preconditions. I could write pages on the subject, but the following should suffice. Zelda plans to gag free speech. She has instructed her spokesmen not to discuss this or even admit to her plan's existence. Obviously, Zelda knows she has something to hide. Comments on the above are welcome, but please think them out first.
QuoteOr perhaps her fans all have serious personal problems.
What the--?!!? :o
Jack! I trusted you all this time and you were doing this to me? Well that's it! I'm leaving. I wonder though. What if you used the site's generator to generate a complaint about that site? Wouldn't that cause the universe to collapse or something.