My Complaint about TDC

[TP Zelda]

if u keep posting on and on, i think people wont wnat to sign up! right Jack?

[medli]

right

[Howl]

stop spamming the board, leave it to the chatboard

[medli]

who do u think u are?!
i'm jking
topic:
........erm,lost the topic 0_o

[MagmarFire]

I really don't have much complaints about TDC. I suppose I like it as is.

[Darth Wyndisis]

Here is a complaint it generated about myself, SL13.

There are a number of things I could have chosen to write about in this letter. I could have chosen to write about how Shadowlink13's ideas have reached a depth of degeneracy that was virtually unknown in the past. Or I might have chosen to write something about the way that some of his jejune jokes are so self-contradictory, they're their own refutation. But, instead, I've decided to devote this entire letter to explaining how opposing Shadowlink13's rude ethics actively and earnestly is the moral duty of every good human being. Those readers of brittle disposition might do well to await a ride on the next emotionally indulgent transport; this one is scheduled nonstop over rocky roads. As soon as you're strapped in, I'll announce something to the effect of how if history follows its course, it should be evident that mass anxiety is the equivalent of steroids for Shadowlink13. If we feel helpless, Shadowlink13 is energized and ramps up his efforts to slow scientific progress. Each of these issues is central to the Lysenkoism debate. I'll probably devote a separate letter to that topic alone, but for now, I'll simply summarize by stating that if you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong. With this in mind, I must condemn Shadowlink13's hypocrisy.

Shadowlink13 exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up his obvious inferiority. I respect his prevarications, although I don't care what others say about him. Shadowlink13's still anti-democratic, vexatious, and he intends to deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols. While it is reasonable to expect that mere association tends to lend credence to Shadowlink13's comrades because people assume they can't be that bad if a respected person is associated with them, it remains that Shadowlink13 is absolutely gung-ho about elitism because he lacks more pressing soapbox issues.

Shadowlink13 has planted his legatees everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on. Not only does this subversive approach enhance Shadowlink13's ability to create a world sunk in the most abject superstition, fanaticism, and ignorance but it also provides irrefutable evidence that he claims that the average working-class person can't see through his chicanery. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in his arguments. Then again, if Shadowlink13 wants to complain, he should have an argument. He shouldn't just throw out the word "methylenedioxymethamphetamine", for example, and expect us to be scared. One does not have to undermine serious institutional and economic analyses and replace them with a diverting soap opera of perfidious conspiracies in order to reinforce the contentions of all reasonable people and confute those of the most myopic drunks you'll ever see. It is a bloodthirsty person who believes otherwise. If I had to choose the most vapid specimen from Shadowlink13's welter of devious gabble, it would have to be Shadowlink13's claim that Trotskyism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society. When Shadowlink13 looks in the mirror in the morning, does he see more than the same, hateful, loathsome face that all scabrous clodpolls share? I can give you only my best estimate, made after long and anxious consideration, but I do not pose as an expert in these matters. I can say only that he constantly insists that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. But he contradicts himself when he says that people are pawns to be used and manipulated.

Astute observers have known for years that many people are shocked when I tell them that the messages contained in Shadowlink13's actions are a powerful source of illumination on the behavior of the most virulent numskulls I've ever seen. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that my current plan is to scrap the entire constellation of shiftless ideas that brought us to our present point. Yes, he will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but what really irks me is that he has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let him play fast and loose with the truth or he'll deny minorities a cultural voice. Contemptible ragamuffins are burdened with the preconceived ideas or feeble understanding of the circles to which they previously belonged, both politically and philosophically. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me. If we contradict Shadowlink13, we are labelled annoying devotees of conspiracy theories. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms.

I'll give you an example of this, based on my own experience. As you know, Shadowlink13's publications have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together -- life! In the end, Shadowlink13 lacks the courage to confront me face-to-face.

"Methylenedioxymethamphetamine," that is a big word.  I should look it up.  By the looks of it, it is a stimulent drug of the amphetamine family (duh).

*Looks it up.*  Oh, it's ecstasy.  Nasty stuff.

[MagmarFire]

No wonder people gave a shorter name for it.

[TP Zelda]

i love it! exept when i dont have any topics that have a reply and when i dont have any mail. thats why i love it when Medli replys tome alot!

[Darth Wyndisis]

I got banned from a couple forums for using this generator.  I did something on the Cleveland Browns Message Board and got banned right away for complaining about their quarterback.  Then I went crazy and started pounding Randy Moss on the Raiders board.  I would provide a direct link, but can't since I can't go back until 2008.

[Evilbob]

Complaint about davros...

My complaint about Lord Davros The Dalek IV
To all readers: This is not a tickle-your-ears, politically correct letter. If you want to read something that's filled with rhetoric, read something else. If you want the truth, then read this letter. What follows is a series of remarks addressed to the readers of this letter and to Lord Davros The Dalek IV himself. Let's all keep our fingers crossed that he doesn't put increased disruptive powers in the hands of the most satanic dossers you'll ever see. We cannot afford to waste our time, resources, and energy by dwelling upon inequities of the past. Instead, we must view the realms of obstructionism and nonrepresentationalism not as two opposing poles, but as two continua. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people were to understand that Davros's press releases are the fertilizer that grows mercantalism to monstrous proportions. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of Davros's oleaginous deeds and morbid beliefs. I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that Davros's tirades do not pass muster by any objective standards. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that Davros likes to posture as a guardian of virtue and manners. However, when it comes right down to it, what he is pushing is both impractical and intrusive.

Davros asserts that he's the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. Most reasonable people, however, recognize such assertions as nothing more than baseless, if wishful, claims unsupported by concrete evidence. Regardless of what he seems to insist, Davros is the most stentorian, foolhardy, and inane waste of genetic material in our society. He might further political and social goals wholly or in part through activities that involve force or violence and a violation of criminal law in the coming days. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome?

If I had to choose between chopping onions and helping Davros attack everyone else's beliefs, I'd be in the kitchen in an instant. Although both alternatives make me cry, the deciding factor for me is that lascivious crybabies serve as the priests in Davros's cult of uncivilized phallocentrism. These "priests" spend their days basking in Davros's reflected glory, pausing only when Davros instructs them to call evil good and good evil. What could be more crotchety? Here's the answer, albeit in a somewhat circuitous and roundabout style: He says he's going to alter, rewrite, or ignore past events to make them consistent with his current "reality" sooner or later. Is he out of his mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that his vituperations can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that we must remove our chains and move towards the light. (In case you didn't understand that analogy, the chains symbolize Davros's fatuitous viewpoints, and the light represents the goal of getting all of us to pave the way for people of every sex, race, and socioeconomic status to fulfill their own spiritual destiny.) You know, it strikes me that most people don't realize that Davros has already revealed his plans to topple society. He revealed these plans in a manifesto bearing all of the hallmarks of having been written by a lewd, atrabilious tosser. Not only is his manifesto entirely lacking in logic, relentlessly subjective, and utterly anecdotal, but it has been a long-standing observation of mine that Davros should just face the facts -- and Davros knows it. His personal interest in seeing his declamations shoved down people's throats is demonic, but that's to be expected of Davros. If he is going to talk about higher standards, then he needs to live by those higher standards.

More to the point, Davros is like a giant octopus sprawling its slimy length over city, state, and nation. Like the octopus of real life, he operates under cover of self-created screen. Davros seizes in his long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection. However obtuse the national picture already is, he has been known to say that violence and prejudice are funny. That notion is so detestable, I hardly know where to begin refuting it. Many people aren't aware of how unpleasant Davros's suggestions are, so let's present a little breakdown. First off, Davros's methods are much subtler now than ever before. Davros is more adept at hidden mind control and his techniques of social brainwash are much more appealingly streamlined and homogenized. Now, perhaps you think I'm imagining things. Perhaps you think that he really isn't going to advocate measures that others criticize for being excessively acrimonious. Well, I wish it were just my imagination. But you know, he should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory.

I don't get it: Where are the people who are willing to stand up and acknowledge that unless Davros provides unequivocal evidence to the contrary, I will continue to think that the odds are more than ten to one that he has mastered the dark arts of diversion and deception? I mean, he just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to convert houses of worship into houses of gangsterism." Is it important that I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke him to dismantle the family unit? Of course it's important. But what's more important is that Davros is out to reduce social and cultural awareness to a dictated set of guidelines to follow. And when we play his game, we become accomplices. A colleague recently informed me that a bunch of vitriolic criminal masterminds and others in Davros's amen corner are about to distort and trivialize the debate surrounding obscurantism. I have no reason to doubt that story because the justification Davros gave for seeking to place callous psychopaths at the top of the social hierarchy was one of the most mutinous justifications I've ever heard. It was so mutinous, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to ensure that we survive and emerge triumphant out of the coming chaos and destruction. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why Davros coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his words sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. I would like to close by saying that Lord Davros The Dalek IV minces to the twang of a different zither.

Read it all. it's quite accurate. sometimes.

[Omni-Link]

I got banned from a couple forums for using this generator.

WOW
you cant take a hint Can You?  

[daemonsage420]

Some people need more than a nudge... sometimes a shove or a punch. that usually gets the blood pumpin.

[Omni-Link]

Yea your right

I think that this should be locked but Jack says he wants to hear what people have to say about TDC

I say it took a long time coming but it is great now and it is actualy getting better.

i have nothing but Good things to say about TDC  

[Darth Wyndisis]

How many times do I have to say this.  This thread is not a serious complaint.  I plugged the sites' name into the Random Complaint Generator, link provided in first post, and it came up with a huge letter that is not meant to be taking seriously.  Read the red text in the first post.

I got one word:  READ!

[daemonsage420]

I fully agree with you there Shadowlink13. People should look before they leap....uhh, I mean speak.