News:

Welcome to the Desert!  Register, post, and have fun.  Why not introduce yourself in the
Welcome Thread?

Main Menu

Is George Bush a Good President?

Started by MasterKeyX, July 06, 2006, 09:18:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Is George Bush, our current leader, a good President?

Great (A)
3 (8.8%)
Good (B)
5 (14.7%)
OK (C)
4 (11.8%)
Not That Good (D)
3 (8.8%)
Terrible (F)
18 (52.9%)
I Can Care Less
1 (2.9%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 29

Nabooru

I dont I mean everybody knows who he is. Hes the freakin president.

Darth Wyndisis

So he is continuing his course while his approval rating is down, and that is showing that he wants to be popular?  How does that make sense?

Nabooru


darkphantomime

You guys are the ones who are insulting yourselves with your ignorance of today's events. First, to clear up some points, you need to read my posts again. You are made to think that there is no distinguishment among the middle east. But your ignoring my points.

1. Almost all of the hijackers of 9/11 were saudi arabic, NOT Iraqi.
2. There is absolutely NO connection between 9/11 and Iraq.

And because you guys have gone on about this, you've lost your point and focus. I'm not saying that we should attack the whole of the middle east. I'm saying that this war in Iraq has been lead by nothing but misinformation and trickery since the very beginning. Bush lied about so many stuff, that its caused more problems than its solved. WAY more problems than it could ever have solved. Since the very beginning, Iraq has been no more but a huge drain on our resources, believe it or not. And we are paying too much attention to Iraq. I'm saying we should pay attention to the whole place, because if we don't, our ignorance will cost us dearly.

And you people, you saying that I am illogical, and countering with your own opinionated arguments makes this debate even more of a lost cause. I'm relying on facts, which if you will ask anyone in this country or the rest of the free world, are irrefutable. If you really think that our current president is a good, or even, great president, then you need look no further thanthe history books for comparision. Bush can bearly bloody speak in proper English. I don't know what language you people are hearing everytime he speaks. But it is NOT english. Ask any high school or college English professor, and they'll give you quite a few examples of Bush-isms.

And to this point, I must add, the more that Bush tries to protect our freedoms, the less freedoms we end up having. Look it up in the constitution, and you'll see that under no circumstances can any of these freedoms be denied, as they have been denied under 'King' George Bush. That, in itself, is treason and an insult to this country which you claim to love.


MasterKeyX

There's no connnection between 9/11 and Iraq? Yeah...were have you been? Saddam Hussein was funding terrorist organizations that helped plan 9/11 and execute 9/11, so to say that there is no connection is completely irrelevent. And we're not in iraq because of 9/11, we're in iraq because a psychotic dictator supposedly held nuclear weaponry, which was recently found in the area.

And what facts are you relying on? Ones created by the liberal party to seem true? Obviously,you have been terribly misinformed abou the events of this entire situation by the party you seem to listen to.

And i dont think its fair to criticize or hate bush JUST because of the way he speaks. Are you kidding me? That's immature and childish.

And what freedoms has bush denied? Phone-tapping was only done to protect people like you, not take away your freedoms under "King" Bush. And treason is when you betray your country, not supposedly "take away peoples freedoms" as you claim to have happened.


RIP my LeafGreen team: 2005-2010

Nabooru


Gamefreak

#97
QuoteAnd you people, you saying that I am illogical, and countering with your own opinionated arguments makes this debate even more of a lost cause.

Ironic, because you're forming your own opinion.

On the topic at hand, even if the attackers were from Saudi Arabia, Al Queda is rooted in Iraq.  And there's been foreign operatives who have been stopped in other countries such as Canada and Britain, who were not of Arab descent.

MasterKeyX

Adding to waht he said, even though they're Saudi Arabian doesnt mean we should go "Oh yeah, they're from Suadi Arabia, lets go blow them up." You dont war with a country because your enemy is FROM there. You only war with places were your enemy is rooted.


RIP my LeafGreen team: 2005-2010

Gamefreak

Exactly, just because of thier nationality, it doesn't mean we should attack their country of origin, we should attack the group's country of origin, which in this case is Iraq.

MasterKeyX

and now, gamefreak has solidified my point. Thank you! :)


RIP my LeafGreen team: 2005-2010

darkphantomime

First of all, where is your evidence that Al Qaeda is rooted in Iraq? Seconf of all, where are the nuclear weapons supposedly found in Iraq?
You people are twisting around my words, yet again. Give me one Iota of evidence that Iraq is the head of Al Qaeda, and tell me why that the very head of that organization has never set foot in that country. Tell me why Osama bin Ladin based his operations in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and give cause for which you have neglected.

That our president can bearly speak is an embarressement to this country. Tell me that you did not feel embarressed or displeased when Bush said "Ob/gyn's should be allowed to practice their love on women."

Give me evidence of what I have asked, Fox News will not be accepted as a source, Period.

Gamefreak

QuoteThat our president can bearly speak is an embarressement to this country.

On the contrary to what you said before, that sure sounds like an opinion.

Darth Wyndisis

I have said before, that kind of statement angers me, political views aside.  I'm dyslexic or something like that and I can tell you from personal experience, it is sometimes hard to talk.  My tongue gets tied up by a lot of words and phrases.  I'm pretty certain Bush has does what he does for a similar reason so when people call him dumb because of that is personally insulting.

Gamefreak

#104
Yes, a speech impediment(spelling?) or personal handicap does not limit one's intellegence.  Look at Stephen Hawking for example.


Listen, there is fact.  But there are two ways to view it.  Whether you agree with it or not is your own moral choice.  But everybody uses fact to form thier own opinion.