Suggestion for Rules

[Mysterious F.]

All the more reason to make it official, really.

[Gamefreak]

Nah, it's probably better as an unspoken rule.

Making it an official rule might blur the line a bit for newer members who might have differing opinions on what a justifiable double post is.

[Keaton]

Here's a rule suggestion.  Let's go easy on the drug references.  Think of the children.

[darkphantomime]

hmm...

references? What drug references?

*runs off to edit a bajillion posts*

[Vaati]

No need to strain your back editing all those posts, I think they just mean, let's just stop from here. After all, there's probably alot near the back of the forum that nobody will probably ever look at.

[Mysterious F.]

I suggest that when a moderator (or administrator) gives a warning, they PM the member who has recieved the warning and tell them why.

[darkphantomime]

Eh, no one's really gotten a warning in a long, long time.

But whatever.

[Hi no Seijin]

In light of recent arguments, might I suggest we ban future and lock existing "Least favorite" or "Things we hate" topics?  They seem to do more harm than good.

[Twilight Wolf]

I'm not sure if that'd be constructive... I think having a topic about things you hate would be fine (for example, I could post about how I hate the post office or asparagus), so long as it doesn't degenerate into personal attacks on members.

[DW]

Yeah, taking away debates and such is a bad idea.

[Hi no Seijin]

I'm not sure if that'd be constructive... I think having a topic about things you hate would be fine (for example, I could post about how I hate the post office or asparagus), so long as it doesn't degenerate into personal attacks on members.

Yeah, I guess so.

Well, never mind then.