• Welcome to The Desert Colossus.
 

News:

Welcome to the Desert!  Register, post, and have fun.  Why not introduce yourself in the
Welcome Thread?

Main Menu

WE ARE GONNA DIE!!!!!!!!!!!

Started by Zelda Veteran, February 13, 2006, 07:13:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jack

Quote from: Omni-Link on March 08, 2006, 05:54:55 PM
were gonna die......
When another World WAR comes and it is so bad taht they have to start Drafting people again....
And you die because u kill to live
( yea well all die as Honorable Soldier's nothing better)

Dude, nothing that bad is going to happen. There won't be another World War because it would be bad for the global economy. Even China is behaving because they are more interested in American greenbacks than blood.

And you certianly won't ever see a draft unless it is a really dire event, like WW2. Any politican who voted for a draft would never get re-elected again. It's political suicide. Heck, even the Army said they don't want a draft because it produces crappier soldiers than a volunteer force.

MagmarFire

I suppose you're right, Jack. The chances of us having to draft in this period are slim to none.



Advanceshipping and Rion had better be Chuck Norris approved.

Jack

Not only that! But also I read an article that said that the American Army, at its current size and if at full strength and unengaged anywhere, could take on the top five armies of the world combined and still smash them to bits.

That's why I don't worry about a draft, because we don't need one.

Hell, we don't even need wars anymore, but this crazy head rogue states keep insisting on acquiring nuclear weapons and threatening to wipe other countries off the map.

We could have that much vaunted world peace right now if people just stopped acting like bloody bleepheads.

dan_the_man

#48
for startes - what the hell is a draft?


Quote from: Jack on March 09, 2006, 08:40:51 AM
Not only that! But also I read an article that said that the American Army, at its current size and if at full strength and unengaged anywhere, could take on the top five armies of the world combined and still smash them to bits

i bet you anything an american made that article.
you guys lost like 2,000,troops aginst a rabble of iraqies with AKs- how do you think you would fare against 200,000 troops fully armed and fully trained with a legion of Challenger II tanks at their side?


BIGGEST ARMIES

     MANPOWER__TOTAL(mln)__LAND(mln)_NAVY(thou)_AIRFORCE(thou)

CHINA___________2.30_________1.60_____________400_____________255
USA____________1.45__________0.51_____________379_____________376
INDIA___________1.33__________1.10_____________170_____________61
RUSSIA_________1.20__________0.26_____________190_____________188
N.KOREA________1.11__________0.95______________110_____________47



WHO HAVE MORE WEAPONS?

TANK/APC(thousands)___PLANES/chopers___SHIPS/SUBMARINES


USA_______________26/44_________________2800/3500_________92/281
RUSSIA______________22/36_________________2500/3000________42/310
CHINA_______________19/30_________________1750/1250________85/315
INDIA________________13/21_________________1080/1115________27/200
N.KOREA______________9/16___________________553/410_________19/93

In addition America have 12 carriers, Russia have one and India have one in construction.


AMOUNT OF NUKES

USA ----------6600
RUSSIA ----- 6300
FRANCE -----500
CHINA -------450
ENGLAND ---380
INDIA --------70
PAKISTAN -- 30

BELEIVED AMOUNT OF NUKES

Israel --------80-100
Iran ----------25-30
N.Korea -----15-20


you guys would get pwned by russia and china , let alone the rest. the US polititions like you guys to think you safe......

Darth Wyndisis

So what if the "US can take on five countries" thing isn't true?  Like Jack said, it wouldn't happen.  The point is the US army is pretty darn good, so us Americans who aren't in the military don't have to worry about the draft.  By the way, a draft is when the military calls on civilians to join in drastic situations.

Jack

#50
1. 2 million Americans have not died in Iraq. That number came from... where? It's like 2100+ have died, no more than 2500. And you're giving Iraqi insurgent combat activites far more credence than they deserve. There is a far bigger difference between an engagement done on equal terms (which is what my five armies statement referred to) and a guerilla war which the smaller force will ALWAYS excel at.

2. Your charts have no conceptualization of quality on them. American troops are the most thoroughly trained on the planet. Mreover, our equipment and supply systems are the most advanced in the world.

3. N Korea's army is an absolute joke. Despite being 1 million strong they are chronically starved and under-supplied, and are dependent on Chinese arms donations just to keep their own people in line.

4. Russia's army is slowly, much like the country itself, dying. The government doesn't have the money to keep the armed forces operational--hence discussions on cutitng back the size of the Baltic fleet and the 2 recent sub disasters.

5. I don't know what is implied with "the US polititions like you guys to think you safe......" However, unlike some countries, we don't need our politicians to do the thinking for us.

6. Consider:


Evilbob

Quote from: Jack on March 09, 2006, 05:33:20 PM

2. Your charts have no conceptualization of quality on them. American troops are the most thoroughly trained on the planet. Mreover, our equipment and supply systems are the most advanced in the world.

Uk are superior!

and nothing beats a good old AK-47
(when it comes to infantry weapons, of course)

Jack

Quote from: Evilbob on March 10, 2006, 08:37:14 AM

Uk are superior!

I agree, I love the UK. And not just because they're one of the only European countries willing to help defend civilization.

dan_the_man

by the way i ment 'like 2000 troops' not 2 million-
serius typo
we (the u.k) have lost 102 troops in the war. 13 died due to u.s freinly fire.lol

anyways- ur guys arnt too advanced - i mean , ur most current tank doesnt even have rifled barrels! (u no , curved grooves in the barrel for a faster and a lot more acurate shot

Jack

I don't know enough about American Tanks to argue the point, but I'm pretty sure that if we're not at the top, we must be pretty high up there. At the start of the war, our tank columns shot right through the Iraqi desert to Baghdad in days and managed to mantian the stringiest of supplylines the whole time.

von Schlieffen would have crapped himself if he ever saw how effective our opening tank run was.

dan_the_man

von Schlieffen would have crapped himself anyway - he had cronic diareeah. lol - its tru

Jack

Quote from: dan_the_man on March 10, 2006, 01:14:32 PM
von Schlieffen would have crapped himself anyway - he had cronic diareeah. lol - its tru

lol, creepy Bismarckian Germans.

dan_the_man

i found the yank freindly fire in the war quite anyoying- how hard could it be to disguingwish?  lol- duno how 2 spell it.

Jack

I've never been in combat, but I think it's a fairly good guess to say that things can get awfully confusing during a live-fire situation.

And not only Americans have been shooting their allies. There's no way that's possible.

Darth Wyndisis

And consider this:  There are/were more Americans in Iraq any other country.  If you think in the simple terms of probability, more people = more people to make a mistake.